
Based on PubMed | Is muscle weakness a known side effect of melanoma treatments such as immune checkpoint inhibitors or BRAF/MEK inhibitors, and how should it be evaluated and managed if it develops?
Muscle weakness can occur with melanoma treatments, notably immune checkpoint inhibitors and, less often, BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Checkpoint inhibitors may cause immune-related myositis, myasthenia gravis, or neuropathy; evaluate urgently for red flags and use CK, troponin/thyroid labs, EMG, antibodies, and neurology consult. Management typically involves holding the drug, corticosteroids and sometimes IVIG or plasma exchange for irAEs; BRAF/MEK toxicities are usually managed with supportive care and dose interruption/reduction.
Muscle weakness can occur with several melanoma treatments, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF/MEK inhibitors, and it deserves prompt evaluation because causes and urgency vary. Immune checkpoint inhibitors can trigger immune-related inflammation of muscle (myositis), nerve (neuropathy), or the neuromuscular junction (myasthenia gravis), which may range from mild to life‑threatening. [1] Immune checkpoint inhibitors are also linked to musculoskeletal symptoms like myalgia and arthralgia, and in some cases true myositis. [2] BRAF/MEK inhibitors more commonly cause fatigue, myalgia, and arthralgia; frank immune‑mediated neuromuscular syndromes are less typical, but significant weakness still warrants assessment and may require dose modification. [3]
How treatments cause weakness
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., nivolumab, pembrolizumab, ipilimumab, durvalumab): These can unleash the immune system, sometimes attacking muscle fibers (myositis), nerves (Guillain–Barré–like neuropathy, optic neuritis), or the neuromuscular junction (myasthenia gravis), leading to rapid-onset proximal weakness, ocular/ptosis symptoms, swallowing problems, or diffuse neuropathic weakness. [1] [4] Severe cases have been reported across different regimens and may appear even after treatment stops. [5]
- BRAF/MEK inhibitors (e.g., encorafenib/binimetinib, dabrafenib/trametinib, vemurafenib/cobimetinib): These more often cause myalgia, arthralgia, fatigue, headache, fever syndromes, and gastrointestinal side effects, with weakness usually secondary to these symptoms rather than immune‑mediated myositis. [3] When toxicity is significant, dose interruption or reduction may be used. [6]
Red flags that need urgent attention
- New trouble breathing, swallowing, drooping eyelids or double vision, or rapidly progressive weakness suggest myasthenia gravis or severe myositis and require urgent evaluation. [1]
- Dark urine, severe muscle pain, very high fatigue, or chest symptoms may indicate myositis with rhabdomyolysis or myocarditis, which can be life‑threatening. [7]
- Ascending weakness, numbness, or reduced reflexes can indicate an acute inflammatory neuropathy. [1]
Initial evaluation steps
- Clinical exam: Document pattern (proximal vs distal), symmetry, cranial nerve involvement (ptosis, diplopia), reflexes, and respiratory/ bulbar function. Proximal symmetric weakness with myalgia suggests myositis; ocular/bulbar signs suggest myasthenia; areflexia/ascending weakness suggests neuropathy. [1]
- Labs: Creatine kinase (CK), aldolase, AST/ALT, troponin (screen for concurrent myocarditis), and thyroid tests (thyroid dysfunction is common with checkpoint inhibitors and can contribute to weakness). Markedly elevated CK supports myositis; normal CK does not rule out neuropathy or myasthenia. [1] [2]
- Electrodiagnostics: EMG/NCS to distinguish myopathic vs neuropathic patterns; repetitive nerve stimulation or single‑fiber EMG for myasthenia. [1]
- Autoantibodies: AChR and MuSK antibodies for suspected myasthenia gravis. Myositis-specific antibodies can be considered, though checkpoint inhibitor–related myositis may be seronegative. [1]
- Imaging/biopsy: Muscle MRI can show edema/inflammation; muscle biopsy helps confirm myositis when diagnosis is uncertain. [1]
- Medication review: Identify current melanoma regimen and timing; immune toxicities often present within weeks of initiating checkpoint inhibitors. [5]
- Cardiac and pulmonary assessment: If chest symptoms or dyspnea, screen for myocarditis or pneumonitis, which may accompany neuromuscular irAEs. [5]
Management principles
- Grade severity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) and act promptly; withhold the suspected agent for moderate to severe weakness while evaluating. [5]
- Immune checkpoint inhibitor‑related myositis/neuropathy/myasthenia:
- Mild (Grade 1): Consider close monitoring, NSAIDs/acetaminophen for myalgia; some cases may need low‑dose corticosteroids. [8]
- Moderate to severe (Grade ≥2): Start systemic corticosteroids (e.g., prednisone 0.5–1 mg/kg/day or equivalent), escalate to IV methylprednisolone for severe or rapidly progressive weakness, and consult neurology. Hold immunotherapy; resume only after substantial improvement and steroid taper, if at all. [5] [1]
- Myasthenia gravis features: Add pyridostigmine, and for severe cases or respiratory/bulbar involvement, use IVIG or plasma exchange and consider ICU monitoring. Early aggressive therapy improves outcomes. [9]
- Neuropathy (e.g., Guillain–Barré–like): IVIG or plasma exchange are commonly used along with corticosteroids, guided by neurology. [9]
- Steroid‑refractory cases: Consider additional immunosuppression (e.g., IVIG for myositis; rituximab or other agents under specialist guidance). Close follow‑up is essential. [10] [11] [12]
- BRAF/MEK inhibitor‑related weakness:
- Supportive care for myalgia/arthralgia (acetaminophen, cautious NSAIDs). Assess for dehydration, fever syndrome, and thyroid dysfunction. [3]
- If weakness is significant or persistent, dose interruption or reduction may be appropriate, with reassessment on rechallenge. [6]
- If features suggest immune‑mediated disease (ocular symptoms, severe CK elevation), re‑evaluate for alternative causes and consider switching therapy, since this pattern is atypical for BRAF/MEK and may indicate another process. [3]
Practical monitoring and prevention
- Before and during checkpoint inhibitor therapy, educate on early symptoms of myositis, myasthenia, and neuropathy, and encourage prompt reporting. These events can be serious but are treatable when caught early. [5] [1]
- Baseline and periodic CK and thyroid tests may be considered in higher‑risk or symptomatic individuals; tailor frequency to clinical context. Neurologic review is warranted for new focal deficits or cranial nerve involvement. [1]
- For BRAF/MEK combinations, anticipate myalgia/arthralgia and fatigue, and discuss fever syndrome management and when to pause therapy. Most side effects are manageable with supportive care or dose adjustments. [3] [6]
Summary table: Typical neuromuscular issues by therapy
| Therapy class | Common neuromuscular symptoms | Serious immune-related syndromes | First-line management approach |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immune checkpoint inhibitors | Myalgia, arthralgia, fatigue | Myositis, myasthenia gravis, Guillain–Barré–like neuropathy, optic neuritis | Withhold drug for moderate–severe weakness; start corticosteroids; add IVIG/plasma exchange for severe or MG/GBS; neurology consult; cautious rechallenge if fully resolved |
| BRAF/MEK inhibitors | Myalgia, arthralgia, fatigue, headache; fever syndromes | Rare immune‑mediated myositis/MG; consider alternate causes if present | Supportive care; evaluate CK/thyroid; dose interruption/reduction; resume when improved; investigate atypical features |
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have well‑recognized musculoskeletal and neurological toxicities that can cause true weakness and require timely corticosteroids and sometimes IVIG or plasma exchange, often with treatment interruption. [1] Arthralgia and myalgia are common and may be managed conservatively when mild, but escalation is needed when weakness is moderate to severe or involves ocular or bulbar muscles. [8] BRAF/MEK inhibitors more often produce myalgia and fatigue; significant weakness should prompt evaluation and may require dose modification. [3] Dose interruption or reduction for BRAF/MEK‑related toxicity is an accepted strategy when adverse reactions arise. [6]
Related Questions
Sources
- 1.^abcdefghijklm4406-Adjuvant nivolumab (flat dosing) | eviQ(eviq.org.au)
- 2.^ab3881-HCC advanced or metastatic atezolizumab and beVACizumab(eviq.org.au)
- 3.^abcdef3600-Melanoma metastatic biNIMEtinib and encorafenib(eviq.org.au)
- 4.^↑4593-Hepatic advanced or metastatic durvalumab and tremelimumab(eviq.org.au)
- 5.^abcdef4616-NSCLC neoadjuvant cARBOplatin pemetrexed and nivolumab(eviq.org.au)
- 6.^abcd2037-Melanoma metastatic cOBIMEtinib and vemurafenib(eviq.org.au)
- 7.^↑3555-Advanced or metastatic nivolumab (weight based dosing) SUPERSEDED(eviq.org.au)
- 8.^ab1819-Arthralgia and myalgia | eviQ(eviq.org.au)
- 9.^abAtypical neurological complications of ipilimumab therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma.(pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
- 10.^↑Novel approaches in the treatment of myositis and myopathies.(pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
- 11.^↑Inflammatory myopathies: management of steroid resistance.(pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
- 12.^↑Treatment of inflammatory muscle disease in adults.(pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
Important Notice: This information is provided for educational purposes only and is not intended to replace professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult with a qualified healthcare provider before making any medical decisions.


